Journalism Need Not Fear Artificial Intelligence

How new technology is coming to a newsroom near you

The impact and potential for artificial intelligence (AI) seems boundless, and although the technology is being met mostly with great optimism, one thing its detractors fear is the looming wave of AI-driven automation that will put many people in many industries out of work.

Morbid curiosity about their own professional obsolescence has made the impact of AI in journalism a popular subject among many tech and media writers, as more and more news organizations are publishing stories written by computers. In the two years since The Washington Post introduced Heliograf, its in-house automated storytelling technology, thousands of auto-written articles have been published on its website.

“Do we need to worry about robots replacing journalists? The answer is a resounding no,” says Meredith Broussard, a data journalism professor at the Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute at New York University and author of Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World. “The state of the art isn’t there yet.”

Much of the fear of artificial intelligence is being driven by a misunderstanding of what the technology actually is. Popular depictions of AI, like the sentient hosts in Westworld or the charismatic droids of Star Wars, don’t quite capture reality.

“One of the things I usually say is that ‘AI is math’,” Broussard explains. “It sounds like because of the name ‘AI’ that there’s a little brain inside of the computer but there’s not … it’s computational statistics on steroids.”

Meredith Broussard. Photo by Lucy Baber

Meredith Broussard. Photo by Lucy Baber


“I don’t think AI is ever going to replace journalists, and certainly not great journalists,” echoes Rubina Fillion, the director of audience engagement at The Intercept.

“What AI is good for is freeing up people who can spend less time focused on mundane tasks a lot of journalists end up doing,” Fillion continues. “It’s really a way to increase productivity and put more resources into reporting.”

AI is being used is many different ways in modern newsrooms, from generating story ideas from trends in social media or choosing a few images related to keywords in an article so a photo editor doesn’t have to sort through hundreds or even, thousands of shots.

One of its most common uses currently is automated text generation. Or, Broussard describes it: “Really, really, really sophisticated and amazing Mad Libs ... You have a template, and you fill in the blanks with words. That’s actually how these computer programs work, too.”

Think of sports, weather, or financial news that relays important numbers and figures. Many of these have already been automated.

“The news organizations that are using it most regularly are Bloomberg and the Associated Press,” Broussard says.

“What AI is good for is freeing up people who can spend less time focused on mundane tasks a lot of journalists end up doing.”

The AP’s use of automation has been so successful that according to a report from Harvard’s Nieman Journalism Lab, they’ve managed to produce 12 times as many earnings report stories while actually lowering their total error rate.

“A human writes a template, and then the structured data gets fed in. If you look at a lot of these stories together, they’re all pretty much the same,” Broussard says. “It’s great because it’s really boring to write the same story over and over again, but computers are really good at routine tasks that don’t change very much.”

While The Intercept prides itself on preserving the privacy of its readers, Fillion notes that other publications and news aggregators could use the sort of data routinely collected by many websites to offer readers incredibly tailored experiences, such as Amazon, Netflix, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter do already. “Adding that level of personalization in news reporting can help give us an advantage and make news more relevant to people,” she says. “You could create 5,000 or 10,000 versions of the same story by plugging in a person’s address ... It can be really hyperlocal content.”

Elsewhere in the newsroom, however, AI is turning journalists into cyborgs by augmenting the ability of investigative reporters and data journalists to find stories. Story discovery engines, like those that Broussard builds, are systems that enable reporters to efficiently parse through reams of data to uncover insights. “What the computer is really good at doing is processing the data and visualizing it in a way that helps you, the investigative reporter, identify what’s an anomaly and what’s not,” Broussard explains.

“It could help find out what the next Theranos or Enron is,” Fillion adds.

Rubina Fillion. Photo by Virginia Lozano

Rubina Fillion. Photo by Virginia Lozano


AI systems were instrumental to the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists’ Pulitzer Prize winning coverage of the 2016 Panama Papers scandal. Buzzfeed News used AI track the paths of spy planes over the United States last year. ProPublica used AI to figure out what individual U.S. lawmakers were most interested in based on what they talked about more than their colleagues.

The limits of how AI systems can be used seem to be limited only by available data and the imaginations of the journalists designing them. That’s part of the reason why Fillion felt it necessary to include women and women of color (including Broussard) when organizing the “AI and the Future of Journalism” panel for SXSW 2019’s Media & Journalism Track.

“It’s really important that you try to make sure that you have people from a variety of backgrounds working on this technology,” she says. “Because the worst thing that can happen is if AI, which is supposed to be the future, ends up reinforcing the power structures that already exist.”

At a time when newsrooms faced with dwindling revenues are being asked to do more with less, the tools offered by AI would seem like a godsend. But there’s less AI happening in journalism than you might think. The reason? Broussard says that though it comes down to labor issues, it’s really the inverse of robots pushing journalists out of their jobs.

“The journalism industry has had problem for many years of brain drain,” she explains. “I know a lot of journalists who have developed tech skills as an ordinary part of doing journalism, and then they discover that they can get paid a lot more in the tech industry, so they leave. It’s not part of the narrative but it should be.”

The AI and the Future of Journalism panel will be held on Sunday, March 10, as part of the Media & Journalism Convergence Track at the 2019 SXSW Conference.

Super Sponsors

Volkswagen logo
Austin Chronicle logo
Porsche logo
C4 logo
Delta logo
U.S. Army logo

Stay Tuned

Sign up to receive the latest announcements, tips, networking invitations and more.